The premise is perhaps too dramatic and maybe a little click-catcher, but I think there is juice. Today when we talk about Agile everyone wants to have their say, everyone wants to apply their method with their thousand variations derived from their own experience. This leads me to ask myself some fundamental questions:
I do not want to answer these questions, because I believe that I am not able but I would like to make a provocation:
Is it true that Agile works only if the Team is intrinsically predisposed to this methodology?
In other words, it is true that Agile is what is native and innate is a sort of collective gift and not a methodology. Kind of like a genetic trait or an innate ability.
In a certain sense, many things in the business world are, for example Leadership, Charisma, a certain intuition for business.
What I want to introduce here is the concept of intrinsic characteristic of a team as opposed to that of a single individual.
At this point I want to return to the title of the article. I think Agile is dead to the extent that you think of it as a discipline, to be taught. Instead it should be considered as a psychophysical characteristic to be trained and always kept ready for each new project.
This is my humble point of view, but the question could have concrete implications, for example in demonizing certain extremes derived from monsters such as the Agile of Agile of Agile, or Frankenstein Manster people that are at same time Scrum Master, Product Owner and any 1000 micro-roles invented by the expert on duty.